On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > Then LVs for everything including swap.
my genuine curiousity question is why you would bother to put swap on raid? I suppose if you had a lot of swapping going on and a drive failed, it could be catastrophic, but that's the only reason I can see. And this may be more than enough reason... I wonder what the overhead for that it though? [...] > > Does this seem like a workable/wise plan or here there be dragons? Is > there any reason to think that 20 GB is too small for a fully installed > workstation including swap and /tmp (everything but /home)? > certainly seems workable to me, but I don't really know about these things too much. Certainly, though (depending on how big your swap is), 20G is enough for the system. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
