On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0500, Sarunas Burdulis wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly > > available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition > > and tried to install etch form scratch using installer release candidate > > one, only to find that lilo crashed when it was trying to make the > > system bootable (installation report has been submitted). > > > > So my next attempt was to copy the still-running sarge system I have on > > another partition into my etch partition, and to try to upgrade the copy > > to etch by changing /etc/apt/sources to read 'etch' where the old one > > reads 'sarge', starting aptitude, and upgrading. > > > > My first attempt was to try to upgrade aptitude first. No luck. > > Trying to upgrading aptitude immediately led to hundreds of packages > > that would be deleted. My guess is they were caught in the libc > > transition. > > > > My second attampt was to try 'U' so as to do a general upgrade. Again, > > huge numbers of deleted packages, and a huge number of packages to be > > installed, too. Went ahead with it anyway, after rescuing aptitude > > itself -- it had decided it was appropriate to delete aptitude without > > installing it again. But just typing '+' on aptitude was enough to > > restore it without problem, so I don't know why it decided it was to be > > removed in the first place. > > > > After about three to four hours of downloading, it started the upgrades. > > Several problems immediately. It couldn't upgrade fontconfig or pysol, > > and refused to try further. pysol needed python2.4, don't know why it > > decided to do that first. fontconfig is now unusable, which causes > > troubles elsewhere. > > > > After various attempts to solve the problems, I am left with a huge > > number of packages to be deleted/upgraded/installed, and X that won't > > work, and a list of 18 packages that have problems. > > > > Should I try again tomorrow in the hope that package dependencies will > > sort themselves out? Or should I just give up and try another way of > > installing tomorrow? Can't think of one now, but one will probably come > > to me it I think hard enough. > > > > -- hendrik > > > Sound like what I have seen "as usual" while doing dist upgrades (Debian > and Ubuntu). Several apt-get {update|upgrade|dist-upgrade|-f install} > cycles often are needed. Some packages almost always get "stuck", i.e. > cannot be upgraded or prevent other packages to be upgraded. For those I > do apt-get remove and then install.
The hard part is to identify the key packages that are blocking all the rest. -- hendrik > > Sarunas > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFFeHn3ejaFVltl6E8RAoNLAJ0ca2sy+0dmNDeWe1iXfs8R7v+TZgCfSSCH > 76OdydxYco71W62XnUWadic= > =CigD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]