Well... It certainly looks like I've got it installed...
However, the version that's available from the "etch" mirrors (and
installed on my machine) doesn't seem to be the same as that on the
website that Mathieu mentions. Is it just that it hasn't migrated to
"testing" from "unstable" yet? Will all this clear itself up when it
gets migrated?
In the mean time, why have things signed by it been allowed to get
into the "testing" archive?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude show debian-archive-keyring
Package: debian-archive-keyring
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 2006.01.18
Priority: important
Section: misc
Maintainer: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uncompressed Size: 53.2k
Depends: gnupg (>= 1.0.6-4)
Description: GnuPG archive keys of the Debian archive
The Debian project digitally signs its Release files. This package
contains the
archive keys used for that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On Dec 2, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Have you tried installing:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/debian-archive-keyring
HTH
-M
On 12/2/06, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anybody know why I'm getting this message when I do "aptitude
update"
> W: GPG error: http://mirrors.usc.edu etch Release: The following
> signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive
> Automatic Signing Key (2006) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A couple of days ago, I was getting the same message, but from
debian.lcs.mit.edu, instead of mirrors.usc.edu. Both sites are in my
sources.list file.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
