Hi Folks, It appears that there are a lot of tools for managing packages and dependencies on debian - dpkg, apt-get, aptitude, synaptic, ????. To what extent do these tools understand the same data, i.e. to what extent can one mix and match between them?
I notice some confusion (someone else's question) about which are the 'official' or favored method in debian - but my confusion is even more fundamental. To what extent is it safe to follow people's recomendations, when one person habitually uses apt-get, another mentions aptitude, etc. etc.? Related to this, I've a problem specific to a combination of aptitude and my employer's internal servers. (We've got mirrors of several linux distros, with company "value add", which I'm expected to use rather than the official distributions.) The people maintaining these sites don't seem to use aptitude at all, and I think they've broken something, because aptitude always tells me that most upgradeable packages are "held" at some current, lower version. (They claim not to have done this on purpose, which was my first guess, since I can imagine them wanting to test and officially 'bless' new versions.) Any idea what they could have done, and how I could work around it? (I don't think it's debian itself, because my home system - which uses the official sites - doesn't have any such problem.) Perhaps what I really need is some kind of FAQ for coping with the large number of package management options and their confusing interrelationships. Does any such thing exist? -- Arlie (Arlie Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
