On Monday 13 November 2006 02:21, Dave Ewart wrote: > On Sunday, 12.11.2006 at 23:32 +0530, Amit Joshi wrote: > > For example, the Sarge CDs provide the 2.6.8 (tagged as unstable) > > kernel. > > I didn't think the Sarge 2.6 kernel was technically 'unstable' - the > installer gave two options: 2.4 or 2.6; although 2.4 was the default, > there was certainly never any implication that by choosing 2.6 you were > opening yourself to an 'unstable' environment... > > Dave.
Yes. Technically speaking, it wasn't 'unstable'. But then its Debian. Whatever is not rigorously tested, is to be tagged as unstable/testing.. :P -- Regards, Amit. Remember fellas, what we do in life echoes in eternity! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
