On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:10:59AM -0800, Eeltje wrote: [..] > Then I decided to install Debian. I chose the 'testing' distribution. > Now I have it two years running and I am very satisfied. 'Testing' is > continuously updated, so you have very recent software. Moreover, the > updating is a continuous process, so you never have to reinstall your > system. Moreover, in 'testing' you have very many packages, which can > be installed with 'synaptic', a graphical front end to 'apt'. > > During the last two years I have experience very few serious problems > with 'testing'. > > I use Debian 'testing' as a desktop system for my own personal use. Of > course, if you are using your system in a production environment you > should choose 'stable' in stead of 'testing'.
I think unstable would be better than testing because bugfixes appear in unstable straight away where they take 10 days to get fixed in testing. -- Chris. ====== " ... the official version cannot be abandoned because the implication of rejecting it is far too disturbing: that we are subject to a government conspiracy of `X-Files' proportions and insidiousness." Letter to the LA Times Magazine, September 18, 2005. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
