cothrige wrote:
> The only observable difference seemed to be that the latter listed a
time of .19 seconds whereas the former had .31 seconds. This may mean
that the + just takes a tiny bit more time to process, assuming that
these numbers mean that. I repeated this with etch and sid each
plugged into the place of sarge and the results were .24/.21, and
.38/.28, always with a lower number for the search without the +. In
none of the cases did I notice any variance in the results however.
I think the time differences have to do with caching. The second search
is quicker because it has already done the search.
--
Andrew Ritchie
Server and Database Admin.
Ed-IT, Faculty of Education
University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia
Tel: +61 8344 8719 Fax: +61 8344 8391
Website: http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
