On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:03:01PM +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One of the reasons why there was not a modularized source tree in > > XFree86 was that it was not allowed to happen. No? So XFree86 never > > could have it, while Xorg now does. And this lead to XFree86 development > > being harder than Xorg. To me this is a differnce, a major difference, > > regardless which version of Xorg has it. > > oh. Then we'll expect to see some significant X development from _you_ in > the near future, demonstrating that your comment was informed.
Hehe. Only on a free software list could someone ask an individual to backup their opinion by producing improvements to a mammoth project like Xorg/Freedesktop :-) The best I can do is send some pennies to the X strike force. :=) Arent you involved with Xterm? Can I conclude that _you_ dont see any benefit in your work. cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com | | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: pgp.mit.edu | my NPO: cfsg.org |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
