This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said: > On Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 23:21:06 +1100, Robert S wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestions. I had a bit of bother with > > volatile-sloppy - spamc started timing out and a lot of spam got > > through. I ended up downgrading back to the sarge version. It looks > > like the latest version in sloppy needs to be compiled by hand. > > > > Think I'll wait until Etch becomes stable - that has 3.1.4, which I > > believe contains sa-update. > was there an error message? Also, did you had a look on [1]? > > I would be interessted in more information, as i am one of the persons > behind debian-volatile. > > Greetings > Martin > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile/2005/12/msg00013.html
The most likely explanation is the increased hardware requirements with newer versions of SA. Frankly, it's just taking longer and longer to scan messages at every upgrade. I can well imagine that if the hardware is several years old, it may just take too long, and trip an alarm. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
