David Hart wrote: > I have no need to read the archives as I have a threaded view of this > conversation in front of me as I write.
Uh, doesn't help when it wasn't *IN* this conversation. But dozens of
times over the past *5 years*. Hence, get thee to the archives.
> I didn't realise that pointing out a factual error made one a zealot.
Lemme know when mutt can separate outbound mail by "account" when it has
zero concepts of "account" in the first place. As I said, zealot.
> I said that mutt can be configured to keep mail separate. I thought
> that the links I posted would be sufficient to point you in the right
> direction to show you how. I assumed that someone who said that mutt
> _can't_ do something would've spent some time studying how to use it.
> Obviously, I was wrong.
I have. I've used mutt many times over the years. I have written
extensively about its problems. I don't feel like doing it again.
> For the benefit of those who may be interested, I'll show one way of
> keeping mail separate in reply to another of your posts below.
Good luck keeping that outbound mail separated.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
