On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:06, Steve Lamb wrote: > Not directed solely at you, Mumia, just something that I've been > meaning to say for weeks now. Know what would really help? If people > would stop replying to spam, quoting spam or otherwise legitimizing spam to > my bayesian filters. That has to be part of the reason the spam getting > through both of my filters (SA and TB). I mean do I consider the replies > to spam as ham or spam? If it's ham then it increases the chances of > false-negatives in the future. If it's spam then it increases the chances > of false-positives in the future. Either way I'm screwed and it seems that > every spam to make it through the list is quoted a few times now. :/
Sorry, I did not mean to respam the spam. Now I feel as though I need to find a special chewing gum. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
