Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:34:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:12:42AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I just noticed that 'gnucash' depends on 'guile-g-wrap', which in turn >> > depends on 'libglib1.2'. Is there anything available there not yet in >> > 'libglib2.0' or has 'guile-g-wrap' not ported yet? >> > >> IIRC, there is currently an effort under way to eliminate all the gtk1.2 >> and related dependencies from gnucash. It appears that the transition >> is not yet complete. > > AFAIK, from lurking in gnucash-devel and -user, that conversion was > completed with the release of gnucash 2.0. That is gnucash has > completed its gtk2 port. They (gnucash) however, do not maintain > guile-g-wrap and can't be responsible for the dependencies of their > dependencies... heh.
Doesn't it cause segfaults if gnucash is linked (directly or indirectly) against two different ABI versions of libglib? Or does glib use symbol versioning to prevent that? -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
