-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/23/06 21:05, Leonid Grinberg wrote: > Thank you for your support, everyone! After some experimentation, I > realized that the problem was that the computer was not realizing that > it was on a switch. Connecting it directly to the router fixed the > problem. However, I would still like it better on the switch. The > problem I think is that it needs a different gateway than the > 192.168.1.1 of the router. Does anyone know how I would tell it to use > the switch?
Huh? Switches don't have IP addresses. (Well, ok, managed switches do, but that's only for managing them...) My LAN is configured like you want yours to be: PCs plug into switch, and the switch plugs into the router. What might be the problem is that you are using the "uplink" port (on the switch) when you shouldn't, or are using a cross-over cable when you shouldn't. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFFe4pS9HxQb37XmcRAsRDAJ9zPQ99nljTpAG/3dydr1G/bwjrBgCfb8J+ CsWyVx5k7SaggY+O7FQH4bM= =70Io -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
