On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:53:28 -0500, "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The improper DNS false positive rate is low, less than 2%. >It's a pity, but very few people think in terms of winning the spam war >anymore. Most systems would consider this false positive rate unusable >by a large margin. The larger the provider, the less workable this >solution. That's the fear factor. But once you get a grip and hang on for a while, you realize that sacrificing 2% is a piece of cake.
