-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/16/06 17:17, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:06:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 09/16/06 16:51, Bruno Buys wrote: >>> Is there any way to objectively measure stability among debian >>> flavours? I mean, does anybody know of a webpage or project or something >>> to build statistics on bug reports? I'm asking this because every now >>> and then we have threads asking how much unstable unstable is, and the >>> replies are always like 'depends', or 'your mileage may vary' and such. >>> If a there's a good soul somewhere keeping statistics of broken >>> stuff and bugs grouped by packages and flavours, I'd REALLY like to see it. >> The problem with measuring stability is that AFAICT, the BTS only >> tracks bugs by package name, not by version or branch. >> > > Versioning was added to debbugs shortly after the Sarge release.
Hmmm, I thought I read a thread on d-devel earlier this month about the difficulties determining whether an rc bug was applicable only Stable, but not to Testing/Sid. :\ - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDJt1S9HxQb37XmcRAjOMAJ9eEnkEUvoPV6s692nUJXrfktrtSQCgp+cG L+vn7S5NOuKs302IvbcUtPU= =/hcC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
