On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:58:49AM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Others have given you good replies. I would add that do not name your
> output file (the executable) as "test". A "test" command already exists
> in Linux.
I don't believe it matters much. Only the crazy and the inept have . in
their $PATH and it's not in there by default. If he has put it in there
then well, it's a good way to learn I guess. :)
--
"To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
greatest tribute."
- High Court Judge Michael Kirby
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
