-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:18:07 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> Nevertheless, have you considered upgrading to 1.5.0.6, either thru >> backports.or or the mozilla.org binary? > > I answered this elsewhere here:
Sorry. I read the thread but must have missed it. > If ever we wanted to take a larger part of the desktop / server market, we > have to change our attitudes. > If I run Debian stable, apt-get should give me a proper, working system. > What a strange approach, to suggest users follow development of their > applications and decide to upgrade from other sources to prevent bit-rot. > > Ron, this is surely not personal. I appreciate your input, even. But if > we wanted to convince Joe User to go for Linux (or GNU/Linux), we can't > want to require Joe to become a geek in order to use it. Really? :( > apt-get is one of the greatest items in FOSS; superior to anything else, > including Windoze update (of course). > It must be and remain a one-stop item to get a system to update and for a > user to run in order to know about the current state of your 'stable' > system. Not Wikis, lists, googles, bit-rots, bugzillas, backports and > stuff. You're right. This bug *should* be fixed. OTOH, IMNSHO, what the heck are you doing running Moz 1.0.2 (or 1.0.8)??????? Upgrade already!!!!!!!!! - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE/UbzS9HxQb37XmcRAiEYAJ4hhGtsIQ2XBU6YTnjfyeNHjoSqEwCcD7J5 XBuZORdFm+hVEKJFz7IUmlg= =LdRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
