On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 16:04 +0200, T wrote: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:59:08 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:41:03AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: > >> What is the difference between the two latex implementations available > >> under debian? > >> > > I think the main difference is that texlive is the new packaging, which is > > more modular (or something like that) and that tetex is the one that has > > been around for a while and will likely be deprecated and eventually > > removed in favor of texlive. > > Good question Micha. I didn't notice it until you asked. Seems it is time > to shift to texlive now. > > However, if I remove tetex, all the following packages would be removed: > > auctex* cjk-latex* dvi2ps* dvipdfmx* hevea* latex2html* latex2rtf* > > and I didn't find any substition packages begin with texlive, execpt > texlive-pdfetex. > > I can't live without the above tools. Does anyone has the solution? > > Funny thing to me is that texlive even has a Tibetan language > package, texlive-lang-tibetan, but don't have a package for CJK. :-( > >
Hi, I think some of those packages that get removed with tetex have different versions that will get installed with texlive. I don't know about all of them, but it's probably worth checking before filing those bugs :) Carlos > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
