It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ... On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:29:51 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26.08.06 03:55, Steve Lamb wrote: > > s. keeling wrote: > > > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're > > > an idiot. HTH. Twit. > > > > Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack. > > > > It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being > > restricted to the command line to get the job done. > > pardon? you can easily use ssmtp or msmtp for outgoing mail. > (yes, direct smtp support in mutt would be nice, but with mtmsp it's not a > big problem) > > > It lacks filtering. > > it supports 'l' for mail filtering. What else do you want? > > > It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified POP. > > I know, I use mutt with imap and I don't have problems wiht it. What IMAP > features do you miss? > > > It lacks a decent multi-account implementation. Having to configure every > > single item by hand without the concept of account inheritance is a > > nightmare. > > tried 'muttprofile'? > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
