On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:21:31PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: > > Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while > wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). > wxwidgets on the other hand has the limitations that it can only due the > common > stuff due to this. > Actually, many of the things which exist only on one platform or another can be emulated by wxWidgets. None come to mind at the moment, but I seem to recall reading in the docs that certain widgets only natively exist on certain platforms, but they are emulated if the proper compile-time options are set.
> wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file > system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot for > doing plots. > The fact that its cross-platform nature stretches to far more than GUI widgets is one of the reasons why I personally like it so much. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
