On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:21:52PM +0100, iain d broadfoot wrote: > * Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:31:46PM +0100, iain d broadfoot wrote: > > > * Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > i agree, now i dont like oranges, so should i hate nazis?? > > > > > > > > oh look, a mention of the nazis, i declare this thread dead :p > > > > > > you do know that doesn't work, right? > > evidently ;) > > > > but was worth a try!! > > actually, it's been proven not to work: > > -------------------------------------------- > 6. "Hitler!" Ha! The thread is over! > > Nope, doesn't work that way. Not only is it wrong to say that a > thread is over when Godwin's Law is invoked anyway (Usenet threads > virtually always outlive their usefulness), but long ago a corollary to > the Law was proposed and accepted by Taki "Quirk" Kogama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called > "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual. > > Sorry, folks. Nice try, though. > --------------------------------------------
who said my invocation was intentional? -- hugh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
