On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:43:02AM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: > Hello list. > > I'm wondering two things. One: Is the latest kernel in Sid the > 2.6.17.7? Two: Why doesn't it say that some where so that I wouldn't > need to ask the list?
It's usually mentioned in the changelog. I agree that it's pretty non-obvious. It would be much nicer if it was plainly visible in the package version number. > I ask because I use XFS with has the flaw on kernels before the one > mentioned. And, in stead of compiling and what not a new one, I'm just > waiting (and degrading) for the afore-mentioned, when I will run the > repair thing as perscribed in various FAQs. The changelog for linux-image-2.6.17-5 says that it's 2.6.17.7 http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.17-5/changelog It was built on Saturday but *still* hasn't reached the repository. I don't know how long it usually takes, but it seems to be hanging around in limbo somehow. I couldn't wait any longer, so I downloaded the linux-image-2.6.17-5 source code yesterday and built it locally. -- CJ van den Berg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
