Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pretty and pathetic does not trump ugly and useful any day of the week. > If it did we'd all be on Windows or OSX. I said they set out to make a great > desktop. They did that.
Hardly. They made an "adequate" desktop. As I mentioned, the QT-apps I've used all seem rather clunky. clunky == awkward. Unpleasant to use. The gnome/gtk apps I've used are not _all_ that much better, but generally do seem to be better. Clearly all this is rather a matter of opinion; my only intent in posting was to provide a counter to your implication that KDE/qt was somehow obviously superior in functionality/usability, and that people only like Gnome/gtk for "political" reasons. That's simply not true. -Miles -- Any man who is a triangle, has thee right, when in Cartesian Space, to have angles, which when summed, come to know more, nor no less, than nine score degrees, should he so wish. [TEMPLE OV THEE LEMUR] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
