Jean-Sebastien Pilon wrote:
Sorry did not see previous post about this.
That means a good bet would be: !?
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 500
I would lower the priorities for testing and unstable, if you really
want to be sure to track only stable. By default, apt assigns a
priority of 100 to packages that are already installed. Therefore,
giving testing and unstable priorities of less than 100 will ensure that
you won't inadvertently install a package from testing or unstable. For
example:
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 90
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 80
It's not, strictly speaking, necessary, but it might prevent an oopsie.
--
Michael M. ++ Portland, OR ++ USA
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute
reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream." --S. Jackson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
