Le vendredi 23 juin 2006 à 09:48 -0500, Seth Goodman a écrit : > > > I'd say it's quite a stretch to say that Elm is at the forefront > > > of MUA technology. > > > > But who was talking elm? Last I checked we had references to > > mutt and Thunderbird. Both of which do innovative things with mail > > and both of which, admittedly, have serious warts. > > Here was the reference to my old friend Elm earlier in this thread: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:21 AM -0500, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > > I suppose the reason is: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Here's the piece of that article that got me going: > > " > Any reasonable, modern mailer provides this feature. I prefer the Elm > mailer. It has separate "r)eply" and "g)roup-reply" commands. If I want > to reply to the author of a message, I strike the "r" key. If I want to > send a reply to the entire list, I hit "g" instead. Piece 'o cake.
The version of this file currently online is 4 year old, and the text may be still older. Besides, the author is just stating what he uses personally, and the first sentence is very important (and true): "Any reasonable, modern mailer provides this feature." T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
