On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:15:05AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote: > I believe the issue is that /bin/sh is expected to be a bourne shell, or at > least closely compatible. zsh, "most closely resembles ksh but includes many > enhancements." ksh has "command language [that is ] is a superset of the > sh(1) shell language." While this means, in theory, ksh should do everything > sh would do, there might be expected behaviors that zsh (which "resembles" > ksh) does not live up to.
Shouldn't apt-get then refuse to run under zsh, or itself spawn /bin/sh and run scripts under that instead of the default shell? -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." - Mark Twain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]