On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:53:22 -0700 Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Liam O'Toole wrote: > > >On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:10:11 -0700 > >Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Apt-cache depends shows openoffice.org-core04u as being dependant > >>on kdelibs4, which is, of couse, dependant on libarts1. > >> > >>I have OpenOffice 2 installed from the tarball at openoffice.org, > >>and then converted using alien. Apt is not showing anything else > >>from oo.o that is to be removed. Is this file just for > >>compatibility with KDE? Can I safely remove it without making a > >>mess of OO.o, as long as I am not running KDE? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >See the output of 'dpkg -s openoffice.org-core04u'. > > > > > > > That is the same as 'apt-cache show openoffice.org-core04u' which I > had already done: > --------------------------------------------------------- > [SNIP] > > Can anyone give me a clue as to whether I need this package, or not? > > Please. > No, this is doing a lot more than providing KDE compatibility. Removing it will cripple openoffice. Are you running Sarge? OOo2 has been backported: http://www.backports.org/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org/ Note that the official openoffice.org-core packages (in Etch and Sid) do not depend on kdelibs4; I expect that the same will be true of the backported package. -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
