I was just reading my own post when I saw a mistake. On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:22 +0300, David Baron wrote: [...snip...] > > > kqemu, isn't a kernel module... I am sorry I mislead you in any way on > > > that. > > > > kqemu IS a kernel module, .ko. Needs be compiled against kernel source and > > installed in .../drivers/misc. > > Are we talking the same package? http://kqemu.sourceforge.net/ > > Which runs QEmu inside of it? > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/qemu > > And it does NOT need to be compiled against the Kernel SOURCE. > > The "kernel-headers-2.6-<arch>" or "smp" added is all the you need. Same ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NO-NO-NO-NO-NO-No, damint. Sorry that is a left over from LONG use of that nomenclature.
It should be "linux-headers-2.6(-smp)-<arch>" [...snip...] sorry about the confusion. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, Better, Faster: Linux Use Debian GNU/Linux, its a bazaar thing NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly without probable cause. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
