"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wulfy wrote: >> >> Hmm... and who pays for this "foster-schooling"? The state? >> > Just like they do now with food and clothes. I had a friend who was a > foster parent for several years. He and his wife have taken in many > kids over the years. Basically, he said it went like this: > > - take in foster child > - spend up to $X on clothing (which is reimbursed by the state, of > course you can spend more and it won't be reimbursed) > - spend up to $Y on food (same as above) > - ensure the child receives necessary medical care (many have been > abused, etc; this is also reimbursed) > > There is no reason why school can't fit into the same model. In this > case, someone has volunteerd (out of the goodness of his heart) to take > in foster children to give them a more stable home environment than what > they were getting before. The government compensates them for their > expenses. This is not a difficult thing.
Isn't better to support a child to live with his/her parents in a stable home environment instead of foster care? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
