On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:52:17PM +0100, Wulfy wrote: > Mike McCarty wrote: > >Wulfy wrote: > >>Digby Tarvin wrote: > >> > >>>ISO is not the same as text. Most character sets only display ASCII > >>>in a standard way. > >>> > >> > >>Unicode is text... just not ASCII. > > > >So is Hiragana. So is Kanji. So is Arabic. So is Hebrew. So is Cyrillic. > >So? > > Digby said that ISO wasn't text only ASCII was...
No I didn't. Please don't mis-quote me. What I originally said was "ISO is not the same as text, Most character sets only display ASCII in a standard way" Let me re-iterate in case that wasn't clear enough. There are many text formats, of which ISO *is* one. But ASCII is the only subset common to almost all, and consequently IMHO is the most appropriate for a public formum where you can't make assumptions about the locale or operating system of all readers... Regards, DigbyT -- Digby R. S. Tarvin digbyt(at)digbyt.com http://www.digbyt.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]