On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:37:21 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:13:03 +0100
> Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I've just done a fresh install of Sarge 3.1r1 on an 8Gb partition on
> > an i386 machine here, basic packages only (no "tasks"), and on
> > checking space usage before proceeding I'm somewhat bemused by the
> > fact that du and df radically disagree on how much space has been used
> > so far.
> 
> do you have any nfs or smb mounts that du might be counting? any other 
> mounted partitions that might show up in du that you're not thinking of? did 
> you mount some other partition as /home for example?
> 
> just a hunch.
> 
> A
> 
> > 
> > In *single-user* mode :

meh. guess I missed that part. so probably no network shares eh?

still, is that you're compelte df output below?

A
> > 
> > # df
> > Filesystem      1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/hda8         8354340    343808   7491140   5% /
> > 
> > # du -sk /
> > 835383
> > 
> > df says ~340Mb used
> > du says ~830Mb used
> > that's quite a difference ....
> > 
> > Googling just comes up with these threads :
> >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1999/12/msg01729.html
> >  df and du disagree
> > 
> >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2000/03/msg00670.html
> >  [bug?] df and du -s output inconsistent?
> > 
> > And the only suggestion in either one that makes any sense is that the
> > difference is explained by the space in the filesystem reserved for
> > root-only use.  This is shown as 104823 4096-byte blocks :
> > 
> > # tune2fs -l /dev/hda8
> >  ...
> > Block count:              2096474
> > Reserved block count:     104823
> >  ...
> > Block size:               4096
> >  ...
> > 
> > Reserved space = 104823 * 4Kb = 419292 Kb
> > 
> > But 419292 + 343808 (from df) = 763100 != 835383 (from du)
> > 
> > It's roughly right, but ~70000 Kb is still missing.
> > 
> > Does anyone think the reserved space is indeed the explanation ?
> > I'd just like to know, before I go too much further with this
> > installation, that there isn't something horribly wrong ....
> > 
> > Perhaps there _is_ a bug after all, that I should report.
> > 
> > TIA
> > Nick Boyce
> > Bristol, UK
> > -- 
> > /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += 
> > effect; }
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 

Attachment: pgpEzEsxTdziW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to