On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:47:23 -0500 Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:43:05PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > hmm... yep, I'd say that's some buggy performance there... unless... do > > you have a winoptions setting for OOo? check ~/.icewm/winoptions for lines > > with > > > > <somemysterystringhere>.OpenOffice.org 2.0 > > > > if there is one that says > > > > <somemysterystringhere>.OpenOffice.org 2.0.workspace: 0 > > That file doesn't exist. /etc/X11/icewm/winoptions maybe. like I said its just a hunch. I still think its probably a bug in OOo. I imagine (totally talking out my ass now) that they probably don't do a lot of testing in the lighterweight WM's. I'dbet they focus mostly on gnome and maybe kde in their test environments. A > -- > Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If you attempt to fix something that isn't broken, it will be. > -Bruce Tognazzini > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
pgpMrCNoOd7Pa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
