On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:48:47 +0300
Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the intended users of the script are likely to use different Unix
> versions, then sh scripting is probably the safe bet. On the other
> hand, if you are counting on them, running your script on Windows or
> traditional Macintosh, then perl is a safer bet.
This is not the first time I've seen this said and I am curious where,
exactly, an sh script would be more portable than a perl script?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
| -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
