On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 10:50:41PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote: > Debian maintainers, kernel developers, etc. flat-out refuse to have > anything to do with a problem which involves closed-source modules. > This is not necessarily because of "politics"; they are just being > pragmatic. After all, they might otherwise spend considerable time to > chase down the bug, only to hit a brick wall once it is clear that the > error is caused by the closed code.
I guess what I'm not clear on is that the xserver-xorg package contains mga_drv.so, but not the mga_hal_drv file. $ strings mga_drv.so | grep hal mga_hal This card requires the "mga_hal" module for dual-head operation The problem is the mga_drv.so driver requires the mga_hal_drv. Is that true? It seems like both files are required, but only one file is included in the package? Are they both closed source? On only the mga_hal? -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]