On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:47:36AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Peter Nuttall wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:19:25AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> ><sinp>
> >
> >>Perhaps one good effect of this is that I am encouraged to
> >>send messages only when I really want to, because it is such
> >>a PITA to send them here.
> >>
> >>Mike
> >>
> >
> >
> >If your mail goes though procmail at some point, you could rewrite the
> >headers with a procmail rule and formail. That would let you mudge the
> >reply-to without anyone knowing, and flaming about it.
>
> How, pray, do I ascertain whether my mail goes through the
> procmail filter? I am very acquainted with *NIX like systems,
> having used them since 1985 or so, but only as a developer,
> not as an administrator. So I'm weak on that score.
>
> I have Thunderbird set to use POP to pull and SMTP to push
> e-mail. So I guess that procmail is not involved. I read the
> man page for procmail, but it seems to presume that the mail
> is getting pulled via normal *NIX means, which I suppose that
> this is not.
>
> One moment while I edit out your e-mail address and put in
> debian'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Mike
If you haven't set up procmail, then your mail doesn't go though a
procmail filter. Sorry for wasting your time.
Pete
> --
> p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
> This message made from 100% recycled bits.
> You have found the bank of Larn.
> I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
> I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
