said... > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:19:04PM +0100, Guido Heumann wrote: > > > I've seen this question coming up before, and I'm interested in this > > as well. It really seems to me that the solutions you mentioned are > > the only "mature" ways for linux-to-linux filesharing. > > > > I also know of the lufs utilities, which can mount a remote > > filesystem via ssh or ftp. In my experience ssh works well, but lufs > > is described as experimental quality in the readme, so obviously one > > should not rely on it. > > > > Are there really no other reliable solutions? I hope I missed > > something too... > > Coda is at least mature enough for the MIT university network and > the stock Linux kernel, if that means anything. Personally, I would > recommend 'unison' as a way to avoid filesystem sharing altogether. > (Unison requires a mirrored copy of the shared data on every client, and > just keeps them all in sync).
I have a share that is 3Tb. More practically, though, when a client works here, connects to the network and presents a share, he would be mightily peeved for all of its data to spread itself across the local universe. In fact, it would present a whole bunch of legal problems, I suspect. -- Best, Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
