On 11/20/05, Jose Salavert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes that was a bad version commas are ok now, now i have made some of the changes you recomend, the problem is that now appear the altgr symbols of pc/latin, not the ones that i have defined. That happens if i write the file this way:
****************This is the good one (attachament ok)!!!!!!!!**************************
* which X server (XFree86, Xorg), which debian flavor (sarge,...)?
Debian 3.1r0a PPC Stable Branch
* what settings do you have in your XF86Config-4/xorg.conf?
(the "InputDevice" section containing the Xkb* options is the
interesting part)
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "keyboard"
Option "CoreKeyboard"
Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "dvorak-plus"
Option "XKbOptions" ""
EndSection
* what exactly have you modified so far in your attempts to get this
working, etc.
I started from the symbols/pc/es layout and made my modifications.
* what does xev(1) show when you press your "AltGr" key?
KeyPress event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x2e00001,
root 0x48, subw 0x0, time 13647421, (381,361), root:(391,466),
state 0x4000, keycode 113 (keysym 0xfe03, ISO_Level3_Shift), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes: ""
KeyRelease event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0x2e00001,
root 0x48, subw 0x0, time 13647501, (381,361), root:(391,466),
state 0x4080, keycode 113 (keysym 0xfe03, ISO_Level3_Shift), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes: ""
* how does xkbprint(1) represent your current/effective xkb setup?
(this generates a PostScript diagram)
xkbprint /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/dvorak-plus
Error: Couldn't read geometry from XKM file "/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/dvorak-plus"
Help me in this part, i want the same geometry as in pc/es.
I have been making the layout by hand with gimp XD... sig
* are you using KDE or Gnome?
Gnome... sig. I will try it in twm an say to you.AFAIK, they add another level of obfusca^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hconfiguration
on top of the conventional methods of keyboard setup...
(meaning someone else would have to help you with this)
Just help me with conventional....another thing I just realised is that you often omitted the comma
between symbol groups. For example, I think the above definition
(which I copied from your dvorak-plus) would have to read
key <AE01> { [ 1, EuroSign ],
[ bar, cent ] };
key <AE01> { [ 1, EuroSign ],
[ bar, cent ] };Should I make something in xkb/rules/xfree86 or other files of xkb?
But If I choose this way:
key <AE01> { [ 1, EuroSign, bar, cent ] };
Alternative continues with the problem. I think one file is interfering with the other, what should I do?
I have spended a lot of time with this because i love dvorak but none of the avaible layouts take cosideration of spanish writing and others, so I am making ok for us. And the layuot is more similar to today layouts plus more thnigs. I will make a web and updates too. I would like to get it included the new layout in linux distros... Old dvorak layout is deprecated ...