loos wrote:
Em Qui, 2005-11-17 às 20:32 -0800, David Kirchner escreveu:
On 11/17/05, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know if that's exactly a black hole, but you can also try to address
your messages to, at least, two other addresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
whois also suggests sending complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . It
would probably be best for customers of UOL to complain to them about
this, as they're in the best position to convince UOL to stop this
sort of behavior.
Unfortunately, most of their clients are very happy with this system: It
is very effective for SPAM protection.
In fact for non-list mail it is really a good idea: all you
correspondents have to respond the challenge one and only one time,
all subsequent mail is unchallenged.
You just can't use this account for list subscriptions.
Besides that they are one of the largest and most popular ISP here.
Michel.
Ok, but this scheme is like forwarding to other people (the sender) the
task of sorting spam out of YOUR inbox. I don't think its fair.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
