Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > Well, the whole problem boils down to "eat what you want". No problems > with that. The problem arises if what I don't want to eat is masked or > passed as something else. Someone's freedom to worship science and eat > whatever crap scientists make should not imply that my freedom not to > eat it may be diminished. I'm not refusing it for you, I am refusing > someone telling me what to eat.
Problem with your rant is that it directly causes millions of deaths. No,
really. Because of all this idiocy that people like you spew one nation in
Africa (Zambia?) refused food for their starving people because it was
genetically modified.
I'm with Penn and Teller on this on how they closed their episode on GMFs,
"Until you and yours are starving to death shut the fuck up."
IE, if you're not starving you have absolutely NO platform to tell people
who are starving that there's problems with this food or that. NONE. And
propigating bad information does influence their decision. So until you face
that prospect of death from starvation get the hell out of the arena.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
