On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:37:37PM -0400, Titus Barik wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > >libgtkextra-dev - A useful set of widgets for GTK+ (development files) > >libgtkextra16 - A useful set of widgets for GTK+ > >libgtkextra17 - A useful set of widgets for GTK+ > >libgtkextra17-dev - A useful set of widgets for GTK+ (development files) > >libgtkextramm-dev - Static library and header files of GtkExtramm > >libgtkextramm0.9-12c2 - Shared library of GtkExtramm > > Hi Kevin, > > Unfortunately, none of these. They are all way too old to compile the > latest version of gpsim (which needs gtk+extra2.1.1). And of course, > gpsim is also out of date on Debian, so I figure gtk+extra must first be > updated before gpsim can be updated in Debian. Also gpsim-led > segmentation faults because one of the arrays isn't NULL terminated, but > I figure I should try to fix one thing at a time. > > Let me know if you have any other ideas that might help. > > Thanks, > > -- > Titus Barik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.barik.net > AIM: TBarik Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 678.528.0256 Hi Titus, I saw on Oct 17 an upload of gpsim 0.20.14-7.2 to unstable. Would this suite your needs? Stephen M Moraco([EMAIL PROTECTED]) did a NMU[0]. He might be able to tell you more about the status of gpsim. One thing folks sometimes forget is that compiling and releasing software for one arch is less complicated than for all 11 that Debian has. So this can sometimes be a delay in things. But the note on the NMU said that it was because of a FTBFS[0] related to the GCC 4.0 transition. Cheers, Kev [0] Non-Maintainers upload [1] Failed To Build From Source
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
`$' $'
$ $ _
,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b
,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$
$$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $
`$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $
`Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
