On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Daniel Garcia wrote: > Why is it interesting to have a different partition > for / and for /home? I have never seen the point in a > home > computer. Isnt it more painful to have to calculate > the size for each partition
rasputnik> * If /home gets hosed, you can still get in single-user to fix/restore it. rasputnik> * same for backups rasputnik> * you can set quotas on a per-partition basis. rasputnik> * one dumb user (possibly you) is not going to be able to fill / rasputnik> * you can reuse /home between different Linuxes rasputnik> * when you reinstall, skip formatting /home and you don't lose your data and when you rebuild or restore ... you only need to rebuild the system directories and /home will always have your own user data hmh> So that your / is as static as possible. And decoupled from about as hmh> much as possible. brad> * any filesystem a user can write to directly (e.g. /home, /tmp) brad> * any filesystem a user can write to indirectly (e.g. /var) but, users should not have any user-defined stuff in /var brad> * any filesystem you want to save the information on (e.g. brad> /usr/local, /opt) add to the list anybody ( you ) can read/write your home data from any other pc if /home is separate, and you cannot screw up the machine hosting /home if its a separate partition RemoveMachine# mount home:/home/daniel /home RemoteMachine# rm -rf /home/daniel - you can do your work from any pc you want maximum disk space for users .. and minimum space for the static system "system files" is backed up on the internet ... millions of places /home/daniel is not backed up anywhere in the world and there's hundreds of ways to recover/recreate a working server -------- you want / to be 32MB or 64MB ( small as possible == smaller is better ) so that you can restore or fix a crashed system in "single user mode" or recreate a brand new system in a few minutes minimum / is typically /dev /etc /bin /sbin and nothing else is needed to boot including /boot is NOT needed you do NOT want to be waiting ( hours/days ) for ext3 or reiserfs checking its entire 100GB or 1TB of disks instead of just checking 64MB system to get into single user to fix the problem if "/" is fs clean, you can be 100% sure you can keep working you want /tmp /var/tmp /usr/tmp to be non-exploitable with 1777 as it's permissions - if those 3 partitions is in the same partition as /, your whole system dies when "tmp" is exploited probably lots more reasons why partitions is required vs the headaches (for newbies) of why it is needed and than there's the lazyman and yet sometimes okay school of thought of just one partition for them, but that doesn't mean others should follow them vs following the crazies with 7 or more partitions - you can decide which way is better for you after you had problems with one approach or the other and why that problem occured in the first place - partitions being 100% is NOT an acceptable excuse but is a sign of inadequate planning or your outgrew your system and time to get a bigger disk cya alvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]