Ron Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 14:20 -0400, Angelo Bertolli wrote: > >>Ron Johnson wrote: >> >> >>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> >>This is fine. Notice how "reply to the list, but don't CC me" isn't >>part of what "reasonable mailers" are expected to do: >> >>"Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a reasonable mailer. >>People want to munge Reply-To headers to make "reply back to the list" >>easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two separate >>"reply" commands: one that replies directly to the author of a message, >>and another that replies to the author plus all of the list recipients."
> Exactly.
Pst, Roon, CCing the OP without it expressedly requested is against list
policy. Furthermore it is wasteful. Reasonable clients should have a
reply-to-list. Keep up man!
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
