On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 23:17 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:56 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 September 2005 2:16 pm, Ron Johnson wrote: > [snip] > > Regarding package managers... apt-get isn't a package manager, has never > > been billed as a package manager, and only started acquiring > > package-manager-like features (Recommends, anyone?) after cluebies started > > whining about how they were breaking their boxen with it. > > ???? > > That must have been a long time ago (relatively speaking, of course). > I've been using it since pre-Woody, and from my POV it's always > looked like a PM, acted like a PM & quacked like a PM. > > Unless our definitions of "package management" are different...
Perhaps he's saying 'apt-get' and meaning 'dpkg' -davidc -- gpg-key: http://www.zettazebra.com/files/key.gpg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
