On Wed, 2005-24-08 at 11:42 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > - Outlook/Express: NO > > - Mozilla Thunderbird: NO, although "Reply to All" gets halfway. You > need to remove the original sender's address from "To" and change the > "Cc" for debian-user to be "To". Actually, re-reading that, that is > probably too cumbersome and should count as a full "NO". > > - Pegasus Mail: NO > > - Mutt: YES (my client of choice) > > Paul, you appear to be using KMail, which given your remarks I presume > you feel it merits a "YES"?
Evolution: Yes however until today I never actually knew that this feature existed. I would have sided with David on this one as well. Since as someone who likes to only remember a few shortcut keys I never knew CTRL-L actually replied to the list. I understand the frustration of having the default action when replying to end up replying to the sender, especially when you are supposed to reply the the list. This is compounded by the fact that this list should have a fair amount of in-experienced users subscribed that won't know or care to know about how lists work and the headers found in lists and that yes indeed there is a feature on most mail clients to reply to a list. Anyways before I start to rant, I just want to say that I would still be for a default action (reply-to header) to reply to the list. -- o) Derek Wueppelmann (o (D . [EMAIL PROTECTED] D). ((` http://monkey.homeip.net/ ( ) `
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
