On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:15:33PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:26:28PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Unless you don't want to develop a GPL app. If that is the case, then > > you have to shell out the $$. Nothing against Qt, but there are > > plenty of other cross-platform toolkits out there, many of them free. > > GPL is free, according to debian at least. The commercial licencing > options for Qt are in addition to the GPL licence. Many other GPL > solutions don't provide this flexibility.
The point was trying to make was that unless you want to shell out $$, using Qt mandates that you GPL your code. What if you want to develop something under BSD, MIT/X, or LGPL license instead? The point is that GTK (under the LGPL) and wxWidgets (under a modified LGPL) provide more fexibility to the developer. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
pgpz3xC8S1XUI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
