On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:44:38AM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > That's what I would suggest, except that I'd use encfs instead of cfs. > I had several problems with cfs, and encfs seems to be more stable and > faster.
This is my favourite solution, sounds most UNIX-y :) -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ FD35 0B0A C6DD 5D91 DB7A 83D1 168B 4E71 7032 F238 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]