Gregory Seidman writes:

> Actually, I'm pretty happy with minicom. Are you unhappy merely
> because it was written in the 90s? Or because it is text-based (as is
> its purpose, after all)?

As Unix-like-system afficionados, we can't afford to get uppity about
what decade our software was designed and implemented in. :)

Like Gregory, I find minicom entirely sufficient. In fact I very nearly
like it.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to