On Friday 15 July 2005 1:11 pm, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > In such a case, you should use stable distribution. Unstable is not for > everyone. It is useless to complain about instability of unstable. > Unstable is meant just to be that. > However that is no excuse for making a dependency for a package that doesn't even exist yet.
That kind of BS is why I stopped using $commercial_linux_distro. It's unstable I can accept broken packages due to ABI transitions but making a critical part depend on sudo-vaporware smacks of the Beast of Redmond. -- Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris. <If Caesar were alive, you'd be chained to an oar.> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
