On Friday 15 July 2005 10:19 am, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:26:44 -0400, H. S. wrote: > > How come udev package has been upgraded in Sid without any warning that > > 2.6.12 is required for the new version? We upgraded a Sid machine > > running 2.6.11 and got new version of udev with no dependency indication > > that 2.6.12 is required. > > The udev maintainer has been asked this several times. His view is that > people running "unstable" should expect some instability.
Well, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy then, isn't it? If he thinks it should be unstable, he doesn't do anything to change it, and it *becomes* unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
