On (15/07/05 12:15), Clive Menzies wrote: > Hi > > Upgrading both 32/64 bit sid systems overnight, I'm seeing the following > error: > > Fetched 24.0MB in 6m50s (58.5kB/s) > Reading package fields... Done > Reading package status... Done > Retrieving bug reports... 0% [0/46] W: not in gzip format: > xserver-common > W: not in gzip format: libxtrap6 > W: not in gzip format: xlibs-static-dev > W: not in gzip format: libxext-dev > W: not in gzip format: libxi6 > W: not in gzip format: libxv-dev > W: not in gzip format: gconf2 > W: not in gzip format: libxml2 > W: not in gzip format: libxmuu1 > ... E: Too many errors while retrieving bug reports > E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* > ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne > 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, > hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi > returned an error code (10) > E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q > '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || > ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited > abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < > /dev/tty ); fi > Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying > to recover: > > Googling reveals a similar issue last september but it seems to suggest > that apt-listbugs will throw this error if debian bts is unavailable; > however, BTS seems to be fine. > > Is anyone else seeing this? Or can you suggest a solution?
Solution has miraculously appeared ;) I suspect it was something to do with interruption of access to the BTS because it now seems to be fine. Sorry for the noise. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
